This example can be juxtaposed with the overall tone of Sherman Alexie's Indian Education. When Alexie reads the newspaper declaring "Indians Lose Again", he snarkily challenges "Go ahead and tell me none of this is supposed to hurt me very much" (Eleventh Grade, 8-9). I don't include this to trivialize Alexie's experiences and suffering, but the attitude it evokes varys widely with that of Staple's. Both pieces portray young men as heavily penalized for their background, and both entwine dark imagery and foreboding diction to convey despair. However, Alexie's passages constantly stimulate pity and self-deprecation, whereas Staples continues to assure his readers of his understanding of human categorization.
It seems to me that Staples is able to distinguish himself by rising above public hate and maintaining a positive demeanor about his situation. When most writers get a chance to share their private experiences with society, they take it as a chance to expel all their memories of injustice to wholeheartedly shame the people who treated them unfairly. Staples manages to refrain from joining this group, and recognizes that his ability to bend public space is only a curse if he makes it so. That's what makes him such a striking individual: he is willing to excuse rudeness as normal behavior and use it to strengthen his identity.
I like how you connected it to Sherman Alexie's piece. We read it so long ago that I almost forgot about it, but it fits really well here!
ReplyDeleteI love your post Anita! It was very insightful and I completely agree. Unlike most writers who write to gain sympathy and spill out their "racial tragedies", Staples does the opposite and completely accepts society's point of view. By doing this, he is able to get onto the same level as the population and to naturally gain their support and acceptance. Great job :)
ReplyDelete